Trout and Rivers Advocacy Urges Rural NZ to Test Water Supplies

All rural households that rely on their own water supplies should get them tested for nitrate levels if that water flows through agricultural land says NZ Federation of Freshwater Anglers (NZFFA) spokesman Steve Gerard of Rakaia Gorge.

His call came following nitrate level testing of waters by NZFFA around Canterbury and in particular the water supplying his own household. Gerard said he took advantage to the NZFFA’s water testing service to have his family’s own water supply tested. The results were alarming. The sparkling spring fed stream at the top of the Canterbury Plains tested 5.0mgl for nitrate, while a nearby house spring water supply has tested consistently at 8.0mgl. 

“I never suspected our lovely spring water could possible test so high, considering our location high up on the plains in Rakaia Gorge,” he explained.

Gerard said there were a couple of dairy farms upstream of the household.

“Whether that is the cause or something else I don’t know. However, the possible health impact at 8.0mlg is concerning for our family, and as an interim measure, we are sourcing our drinking water from the town supply” he said. 

Overseas studies have shown a strong link between high nitrate levels in drinking water and bowel cancer in humans. Bowel cancer is the second-highest cause of cancer death in New Zealand while a 2018 Danish study of 2.7 million people has shown a strong link between nitrate levels and the disease. In addition, high nitrate levels in water have a link to human birth problems such as underweight and premature babies.

“New Zealand has one of the highest bowel cancer rates in the world. Recent data show also that drinking water supplies in some parts of New Zealand have nitrate levels more than three times higher than the threshold level for colorectal cancer risk identified in the Danish study,” explained Gerard.

He reiterated all rural households that rely on their own water supplies should get testing particularly if that water flows through agricultural land.

Photo:-The “lovely spring water”.

This entry was posted in Home. Bookmark the permalink.

1 Response to Trout and Rivers Advocacy Urges Rural NZ to Test Water Supplies

  1. Alan+Rennie says:

    Natural Versus Artificial Nitrates
    It has often been claimed by the manufacturers of artificial fertilizers that their factory made products are in every respect equal to the mineral elements that are found in natural manures and in the soil itself. That they should believe in their own products is to be expected. If this were not so, then they could only be regarded as profit grabbing hypocrites carrying on criminal activities. And yet is it not reasonable to suppose that man, by his very nature, is incapable of producing with exactitude the natural elements of the earth? If he could in this true sense of the word “create,” then he would cease to be man and be on an equality with the Creator of the universe.

    Modern science has progressed so far in determining the composition of material things that man has almost imperceptibly drifted into the belief that he has only to combine certain chemicals in certain ways to reproduce exactly the natural materials needed in daily life. But, on the other hand, does not the man in the street instinctively distrust the concoctions of science? It is doubtful whether the average man will ever believe that synthetic rubber, for instance, can be in every respect as good as real rubber from the forest. Such skepticism is inherent, and it is well that it should put us on our guard against the too easy acceptance of the results achieved by scientific skill.

    The New English Weekly of March 29, 1945, supports this view, quoting the case of natural as compared with artificial nitrates:

    “It is always good to see the difference between natural and laboratory products emphasized, in recognition of the imponderable elements with which Nature endows substances, which can by no scientific skill be added to the synthetic product. The case in point is that of nitrates, and the report emanates from one of the USA universities. It states: ‘Natural nitrates have something that the artificial lacks, and there is no completely adequate substitute for it in the field of agricultural fertilizers. Chilean nitrate contains small amounts of vital ‘impurities’ such as magnesium, iodine, boron, calcium, potassium, lithium, and strontium, which are to plants what the vitamins in fresh foods are to human beings. It has been found that natural nitrate does something that makes apples stay on trees; that it does something to corn that results in better livestock fattened on it; that chickens raised on nitrated feed lay better eggs of greater fertility. It is just as impossible to make artificial nitrates that duplicate natural nitrates as it is to make synthetic seawater that contains all the elements of natural sea water.’”

    It is just here that the danger of scientific research lies. No scientist has ever produced or is ever likely to produce life, and the natural universe holds mysteries that will never be reduced to a formula or manufactured in the laboratory. The crucial test of real scientific achievement is whether it recognizes and respects the supremacy of Mother Earth or ignorantly attempts to substitute the false for the true.
    And when mixed with other poisons in our water = CANCER

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The maximum upload file size: 80 MB. You can upload: image, audio, video, document, spreadsheet, interactive, text, archive, code, other. Links to YouTube, Facebook, Twitter and other services inserted in the comment text will be automatically embedded. Drop file here